Holy
Week, in fact the entire Lenten season, brings us to the Easter
garden of the empty tomb. The Easter season brings into focus one of
the pivotal mysteries of the Christian faith. It places us face to
face with the resurrection of Christ. And such a meeting cries out
for some response.
The reactions to Easter run the entire gamut from explicit
rejection to ardent self-immolating acceptance. In the spectrum in
between, we can find various responses to the church’s cry,
“Rejoice, the Lord is risen!”
The question of what Easter means was first answered by St. Paul
in one of the earliest expressions of the church’s teaching. Paul
was writing to the Corinthians. For him, the risen Lord was the
heart and soul of Christianity. The risen Lord necessarily implies a
resurrection.
In writing to the Corinthians, Paul apparently was attempting to
settle some of the problems revolving around the question of the
risen body. Paul does not seem to face any challenge on the fact
that Christ is risen. In fact, he presents this as the accepted
Gospel message — accepted also at Corinth: “I handed on to you the
facts which had been imparted to me, that Christ died for our sins …
was buried, that he was raised to life on the third day” (1 Cor
15:3-4).
Paul’s teaching
Interestingly, in this earliest formula of faith we see listed
the fact that Christ was dead and bodily buried. His death was not
symbolic, nor was there question about the fact that he was
committed to the grave as are all the dead. This one phrase “was
buried” is not without significance alongside the next line that
reads, “he was raised to life.” For St. Paul the continuity of
Christ’s life-death-risen life is an established fact. The same
Christ, in the flesh, who hanged on Calvary, was anointed for
burial, and rose from the dead.
Paul goes on in his letter to explain that the resurrection of
Christ was a pledge to all believers that they too would rise. But
the keystone of his whole argument is that first Christ is risen.
“If there be no resurrection, then Christ was not raised” (15:24).
Surely Paul, who just finished relating the narrative of the
death, burial and resurrection of Christ, is not speaking of his
resurrection “in spirit” only. To the Corinthians he is preaching a
bodily resurrection. It is precisely this bodily resurrection that
they doubt. So Paul links every resurrection in glory to Christ’s
resurrection in the flesh. “If Christ was not raised, then our
Gospel is null and void and so is your faith” (15:17).
Not only does Paul stake the worth of his whole mission on the
physical resurrection of Christ but the validity of the entire
Christian dispensation. The new order preaches not only Jesus
resurrected from the land of the dead as the Christ — flesh and
spirit, who walked the land of the living — but it preaches our
resurrection from the dead because of Christ. “We turn out to be
lying witnesses for God because we bore witness that he raised
Christ to life, whereas, if the dead are not raised he did not raise
him” (15:15).
The whole basis for belief in the resurrection of the dead is the
resurrection of Christ. That resurrection is confirmed by the
knowledge that Christ appeared to his disciples with a risen body
after death. Without this fact, Christian faith is sterile and the
Christian way of life is needless bother.
Equally important is the fact that Paul appeals to history and
the evidence of eyewitnesses to the appearance of Christ, many of
whom were still alive, to attest his witness. Paul seems to take for
granted that all know and believe firmly that Christ rose bodily
from the dead. His object was to convince the others that
resurrection has an effect also on them.
Today, the same exhortation might be in order. Theological
questions naturally arise. If Christ rose from the dead, where is
his body? What physical substance is there in the kingdom of the
risen? But these questions are secondary to the fact that Christ is
risen.
As the Corinthians questioned the resurrection of all the dead,
so Paul replied that Christ was also the explanation of eternal
life. So too as we question academically what became of the body or
what will become of our bodies, the church, with Paul, answers. If
Christ is risen, then our faith need not falter over little points
we find hard to understand. Paul writes and the church teaches. “But
the truth is, Christ was raised to life — the first fruits of the
harvest of the dead” (15:20).
In later Pauline writings we see this theme carried to a fuller
development. In the letter to the Colossians, the author says, “He
is, moreover, the head of the body, the church. He is its origin,
the first to return from the dead, to be in all things alone
supreme” (Col 1:18). Whereas all creation was through the Word, so
all re-creation is through the risen Christ.
The resurrection of all the dead in this sense is seen as a
participation in the resurrection of Christ. For Paul this takes
place in stages. First, Christ is raised from the dead. In so doing,
he conquers death and offers the same victory to his followers. Then
come all those who share in his resurrection. These will join him at
this second coming, and die in that hope. Finally comes the end when
Christ, joined by his faithful, hands over his kingdom to his
Father.
In the letter to the Colossians (1:13), the author apparently
carried the same theme through to a more explicit expression. In any
case, it is precisely death that is defeated by Christ. Not only the
hostile spiritual powers that threaten man, but death itself, meets
its victor.
Needless to say, Paul, as does the church, distinguishes between
what has been started and its perfection. Neither death nor the
forces of evil have been definitely vanquished in so far as this
world goes. But the final victory has been declared. Christ’s own
resurrection is the sign that it will certainly come.
The church has always maintained that God sent forth his Son into
the world. The Son alone won our redemption with the price of his
blood. But by rising from the dead, the Son was able to return to
his Father. In so doing, he could send the Holy Spirit to bring to
completion what his own life and work had started. It is the ancient
faith of the church. John synthesized the elements of God’s plan in
the first chapter of his Gospel.
Here we see not a Christ of “influence” affecting man. John
presents no memory of a good, even heroic man as our present hope.
No cult myth guarantees our final victory over this world. The risen
Christ, Jesus the Galilean, in the flesh, raised from the dead,
ascended to his Father, is our Lord. As the Lord of the living and
the dead, he sends the Spirit to lead the church to find triumph.
Fundamentally, the acceptance of a risen Lord rests on the
acceptance of the Incarnation. Through the God-made-man and then
glorified, we have the church made holy by the Spirit. The Son,
reunited with his Father, sends his Spirit that other men may live
forever.
All of these are “hard sayings,” but God coming into our human
bodily life is itself a “difficult idea.” In faith, the fact remains
that through these crooked pens God chose to write a straight line.
He took a body, raised it and glorified it. But even more
importantly, he promised us the same.